Want a Shipping Estimate? Add an Indian Pin Code, Click Here
This Product
Ships in 3-4 Weeks
Recommend
1
Share
1
Share
1
Share
0
Share
1
Send By e-mail
Verify Phone Number
Please enter the One Time Password (OTP) to verify phone number.
Write your own review
In just a few steps below you can become an online reviewer.
Please click on Continue to submit your review.
Title: Cambridge Studies in Law and Society: The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights
Reviewed By:
Write your review here:
NOTE:HTML is not translated!
Rating:
Share this product on email
Cambridge Studies in Law and Society: The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights
Product Details:
Format: Paperback / softback
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Language: English
Dimensions: 23.00 X 1.00 X 15.00
Publisher Code: 9781107601635
Date Added: 2018-08-05
Search Category: International
Jurisdiction: International
Overview:
Today, the idea of human rights enjoys near-universal support; yet, there is deep disagreement about what human rights actually are - their true source of origin, how to study them, and how best to address their deficits. In this sweeping historical exploration, Christopher N. J. Roberts traces these contemporary conflicts back to their moments of inception and shows how more than a half century ago a series of contradictions worked their way into the International Bill of Human Rights, the foundation of the modern system of human rights. By viewing human rights as representations of human relations that emerge from struggle, this book charts a new path into the subject of human rights and offers a novel theory and methodology for rigorous empirical study.
+ View More
Table Of Contents:
1. What are human rights and where do they come from?; 2. From war and politics to human rights: the Cold War and colonial recession; 3. Protecting state sovereignty from the 'dangers' of human rights; 4. Saving empire: the attempt to create (non)universal human rights; 5. A version of human rights that permits racial discrimination?; 6. The United States' unequivocal ambivalence towards socioeconomic rights.