Want a Shipping Estimate? Add an Indian Pin Code, Click Here
This Product
Ships in 3-4 Weeks
Recommend
1
Share
4
Share
2
Share
5
Share
5
Send By e-mail
Verify Phone Number
Please enter the One Time Password (OTP) to verify phone number.
Write your own review
In just a few steps below you can become an online reviewer.
Please click on Continue to submit your review.
Title: Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law: International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement: How Much Institutional Sensitivity?
Reviewed By:
Write your review here:
NOTE:HTML is not translated!
Rating:
Share this product on email
Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law: International Organizations in WTO Dispute Settlement: How Much Institutional Sensitivity?
Product Details:
Format: Paperback / softback
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Language: English
Dimensions: 23.00 X 2.00 X 15.00
Publisher Code: 9781107471139
Date Added: 2018-08-10
Search Category: International
Jurisdiction: International
Overview:
This book analyses the role of international organizations in WTO dispute settlement as arising from a number of WTO disputes. In particular, the roles of the IMF, WIPO, WCO and WHO are addressed. The use of the Vienna Convention rules of interpretation framework allows an evaluation of the weight attributed to this material by the WTO adjudicator. This allows specific conclusions to be drawn regarding the level of institutional sensitivity of the WTO adjudicator to each of the organizations. As well as being a valuable source of research, the analysis will appeal to international law scholars, civil servants and law practitioners interested in the WTO and dispute settlement.
+ View More
Table Of Contents:
1. The institutional sensitivity of the WTO adjudicator; 2. The WTO linking techniques; 3. The VCLT rules of interpretation; 4. Internal and external constraints; 5. The competence and credibility of IOs; 6. The International Monetary Fund; 7. The World Intellectual Property Organization; 8. The World Customs Organization; 9. The WHO and the Codex Alimentarius Commission.