EBC Learning Course on Cracking the Advocate-on-Record Examination along with B.R. Agarwalas Supreme Court Practice and Procedure and Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Bare Act

EBC Learning Course on Cracking the Advocate-on-Record Examination Law Course Online (Premium)

Advocate-on-Record (AOR) is one of the toughest examinations in the fields of law, attempted by experienced professionals. Every year, around 1000 aspirants with over 5 years of experience as advocates write the exam. The passing grade in the examination in the initial years was comparatively very less. Gradually, the number of aspirants who clear the exam has increased with around 20% of candidates clearing the same in 2019.

This course comprises the criteria for appearing in the examination, examination analysis and paper-wise analysis and tips. The course will give you the edge that you need to succeed.

B.R. Agarwalas Supreme Court Practice and Procedure (includes Supreme Court Rules, 2013 AOR Exam Regulations, 2014 E-filing)

Thirteen years have gone by since the last edition appeared. Much has changed since then, both in the nature of litigation before the Court and in its practice and procedure. The contents of the book have, therefore, undergone significant changes, both by way of additions and deletions. The 'basic structure ' of Agarwala 's work however remains undisturbed.

The book seeks to serve as a reliable guide and companion to the practitioner in the Supreme Court. In the words of Hon'ble Justice J.M. Shelat, "...the Court has had to evolve its own practice and procedure relating to each of the different jurisdictions by means of Rules framed under Article 145 of the Constitution. These rules have not remained static. They had to be revised from time to time as the actual experience of their work and the exigencies demanded. The Rules have sometimes come up before the Court for their construction and elucidation. Opinions expressed by the Court on such occasions have more often than not been, by way of observations, scattered in different cases and rarely as distinct decisions by themselves. Consequently, such observations are not readily found unless they are collected together in one place. That is precisely what the author of this book has sought to do. The result of his labor is handy, lucid work. The book falls into two parts; the first part deals with each of the different jurisdictions and the second deals separately with the Rules in respect of each of them. Such separate and distinctive treatment is, I believe, likely to be helpful to the Bar and particularly to the advocates-on-record."

Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Bare Act